In the Matter of O.D. v. Ashley Healthcare Plan, 2013 WL 5430458 (9/27/13), the ERISA plan which had paid $33,683.58 for a minor’s medical bills (for personal injuries sustained in motor vehicle accident) removed the minor’s petition seeking approval for settlement of claim of minor from the Chancery Court of Pontotoc County, Mississippi. This decision grants the plaintiff’s Motion to Remand.
The Court notes, at *5, that the petition for approval of settlement of claims,
does not affirmatively allege a federal claim… It is well settled law that a case may not be removed to the federal court on the basis of a federal defense, including the defense of pre-emption, even if the defense is anticipated in the plaintiff’s complaint, and even if both parties concede that the federal defense is on the only question truly at issue.
As to the suggestion that ERISA preempts state law related to the ability of state court to approve a minor’s settlement, the Court holds at *4,
The Court finds, based on the above-cited cases, and an understanding of Congress’ intent with regard to preemption and those areas traditionally regulated by the states, that Plaintiff’s claim for approval of the minor’s settlement are not preempted by ERISA.
Thanks to Professor Roger Baron for the above commentary.